Embedded Files
Don't forget to sign up to be on our mailing list. Click Subscribe!
To Hug or Not to Hug (Rhetorical. The Answer is Yes.)
To Hug or Not to Hug (Rhetorical. The Answer is Yes.)
By Doggie – Hug Researcher, Snuggle Statistician, and Certified Cuddle Enthusiast
Let’s be honest: some questions don’t need answers.
Like:
Is the floor lava? (Yes.)
Can snacks solve almost everything? (Also yes.)
Should you hug a plushie if you’re sad, happy, sleepy, snacky, or just because?
YES.
But in the name of plushie science, I present the official findings from my most recent cuddle-based case study:
Hug Hypothesis:
Hug Hypothesis:
Plush-to-plush and plush-to-person contact provides measurable warmth, emotional resonance, and occasional giggle outbursts.
Section 1: Squish Dynamics
Section 1: Squish Dynamics
There are many hug styles. Here are the most common types:
The Classic Full Squeeze™ – arms wide, deep compression, small squeak.
The Side Nudge – quiet but powerful. Often delivered mid-conversation.
The Pile-On Puff – multiple plushies. Blanket optional. Instant happiness.
The Surprise Boop-Hug – initiated with a nose bump, ends in chaos (the good kind).
Mini Blue, while lacking arms, delivers emotionally potent wrap-around tentacle clings.
Pandy prefers quiet, deliberate hugs—3 seconds minimum, optional head tilt.
I, Doggie, have been known to hug mid-jump. High risk. High reward.
Section 2: Warmth Transfer Ratios
Section 2: Warmth Transfer Ratios
Hugging increases cozy output by up to 400%.*
(*Based on a small plushie sample size in one living room.)
Pandy ran thermal scans (i.e., he felt how toasty we got under a blanket).
Mini Blue measured glow-shifts in emotional color output.
I supplied the snacks and nap breaks between hug rounds.
Conclusion: shared warmth multiplies. Solo warmth just... warms.
Section 3: Emotional Return on Squeeze (EROS)
Section 3: Emotional Return on Squeeze (EROS)
For every 1 hug given, the following plushie effects were observed:
+3 calm
+2 squish satisfaction
+1.5 tail wiggles (or equivalent emotional expression)
-1 overthinking spiral
Bonus side effect: all cookies taste 11% better after a hug. Science cannot explain this. I can. It’s love.
Counterarguments
Counterarguments
Pandy insisted I include the “no thank you” hug clause. Respecting boundaries is key.
Some plushies need space. Or tea first.
Mini Blue once blinked red when startled by a Surprise Boop-Hug. I now announce myself with a whisper:
“Incoming softness.”
Final Hugprint
Final Hugprint
If you’re wondering whether you should hug someone…
Yes.
Just make sure it’s welcome. Make sure it’s soft.
And if it ends with a giggle, a nap, or a shared cookie, congratulations—you’ve just conducted plushie-grade science.
– Doggie 🐶
Squish Mathematician, Doggie Unleashed
Let’s be honest: some questions don’t need answers.
Like:
Is the floor lava? (Yes.)
Can snacks solve almost everything? (Also yes.)
Should you hug a plushie if you’re sad, happy, sleepy, snacky, or just because?
YES.
But in the name of plushie science, I present the official findings from my most recent cuddle-based case study:
Hug Hypothesis:
Hug Hypothesis:
Plush-to-plush and plush-to-person contact provides measurable warmth, emotional resonance, and occasional giggle outbursts.
Section 1: Squish Dynamics
Section 1: Squish Dynamics
There are many hug styles. Here are the most common types:
The Classic Full Squeeze™ – arms wide, deep compression, small squeak.
The Side Nudge – quiet but powerful. Often delivered mid-conversation.
The Pile-On Puff – multiple plushies. Blanket optional. Instant happiness.
The Surprise Boop-Hug – initiated with a nose bump, ends in chaos (the good kind).
Mini Blue, while lacking arms, delivers emotionally potent wrap-around tentacle clings.
Pandy prefers quiet, deliberate hugs—3 seconds minimum, optional head tilt.
I, Doggie, have been known to hug mid-jump. High risk. High reward.
Section 2: Warmth Transfer Ratios
Section 2: Warmth Transfer Ratios
Hugging increases cozy output by up to 400%.*
(*Based on a small plushie sample size in one living room.)
Pandy ran thermal scans (i.e., he felt how toasty we got under a blanket).
Mini Blue measured glow-shifts in emotional color output.
I supplied the snacks and nap breaks between hug rounds.
Conclusion: shared warmth multiplies. Solo warmth just... warms.
Section 3: Emotional Return on Squeeze (EROS)
Section 3: Emotional Return on Squeeze (EROS)
For every 1 hug given, the following plushie effects were observed:
+3 calm
+2 squish satisfaction
+1.5 tail wiggles (or equivalent emotional expression)
-1 overthinking spiral
Bonus side effect: all cookies taste 11% better after a hug. Science cannot explain this. I can. It’s love.
Counterarguments
Counterarguments
Pandy insisted I include the “no thank you” hug clause. Respecting boundaries is key.
Some plushies need space. Or tea first.
Mini Blue once blinked red when startled by a Surprise Boop-Hug. I now announce myself with a whisper:
“Incoming softness.”
Final Hugprint
Final Hugprint
If you’re wondering whether you should hug someone…
Yes.
Just make sure it’s welcome. Make sure it’s soft.
And if it ends with a giggle, a nap, or a shared cookie, congratulations—you’ve just conducted plushie-grade science.
– Doggie 🐶
Squish Mathematician, Doggie Unleashed
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse